Case Manager: Katy Jones
Hon. Leslie G. Landau (Ret.) joined ADR Services, Inc. in 2023 after 20 years of distinguished service as a Judge of the Superior Court for the County of Contra Costa.
After graduating from Cornell Law School in 1983 and clerking for Judge William E. Doyle in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Judge Landau joined the litigation practice at McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen in San Francisco. She developed a specialty in appeals, argued cases for clients in appellate courts throughout the country, and was national appellate counsel for several automobile manufacturers. She became a partner in 1990, served as Managing Partner of the San Francisco office, and chaired the Appellate Group (both for the McCutchen firm and the successor merged firm, Bingham McCutchen LLP). Her appellate practice required her to quickly master legal issues and complex factual matters across a broad range of substantive areas, including product liability, federal securities law, federal preemption and other constitutional issues. She was elected a member of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers in 2000.
Judge Landau was appointed to the Contra Costa Superior Court bench by Governor Gray Davis in 2003. She sat in multiple assignments during her 20-year judicial career. Although a civil attorney by training and experience, in her early years Judge Landau served on the criminal side of the bench, mastering criminal law and procedure to handle high volume calendars, decide legal and evidentiary motions, and preside over hundreds of jury trials. In 2015, Judge Landau moved to the civil side of the Court, where she sat in juvenile and family law assignments. During her two tours in the Family Division, she presided over thousands of contested and complex family law matters – settlement conferences, short-cause hearings, and long-cause trials — involving every conceivable issue arising in family law. She became well-versed in the nuances of issues including child custody and visitation, child and spousal support, marital dissolution, division of property, business valuation, complex accounting, move-aways, and separate property tracing disputes. Judge Landau served as the Supervising Judge of the Family Division of the Court, working closely with the Bar to help shepherd the Court’s move to electronic filing, adopt hybrid appearance technology and rules, and assure access to justice as the Court managed and emerged from the COVID crisis.
Judge Landau brought her appellate expertise to the Superior Court, serving as a longtime member of the Court’s Appellate Division, including several stints as its Presiding Judge. She authored hundreds of Appellate Division opinions, on issues arising out of criminal cases, limited civil matters and writs. A collaborative colleague and exceptional writer, Judge Landau was often tapped by other judicial officers to work through complex legal issues and review and revise draft opinions.
Judge Landau has been recognized by the legal community for being hardworking, a deep legal thinker, a quick study, human and fair. She is a thoughtful and creative jurist, as good with people as she is with complex and subtle legal issues. Her ability to see and connect with the people behind the disputes make her an effective mediator and communicator. Her clear writing makes her decisions understandable and compelling. She anticipates issues, particularly in complex custody and business disputes, assisting parties in managing potential pitfalls and crafting decisions that account for them. In 2023, she was honored as Trial Judge of the Year by the Alameda-Contra Costa Trial Lawyers Association (ACCTLA).
Character, Valuation and Division of Property: accounting for separate property contributions to community property and community contributions to separate property; tracing for separate property reimbursement claims; business valuation; valuation and division of unusual and illiquid assets; accounting for non-salary compensation, including performance bonuses, commissions, stock distribution and stock options; deferred compensation and post-separation buyout of vacation accrued during marriage; reimbursement and post-separation accounting, claims of fiduciary breach.
Child Custody and Visitation: developmentally appropriate parenting plans; high conflict parents, parental substance abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, domestic violence, parental alienation and estrangement; children with physical and mental health challenges, learning differences, refuse/resist dynamics, school refusal, gender dysphoria; school choice and home schooling; “move away” disputes.
Spousal and Child Support: establishment, modification, and enforcement of support orders; income available for support, including self-employment income, income tax write offs and depreciation, cash wages, investment and rental income, family gifts, and loans, disability, vocational evaluations, and imputed income; support for adult children under Family Code section 3910.
Contested Separation Date: divergent separation date claims; equivocal communication about separation.
Post-Judgment Issues: Modification of permanent spousal support, omitted assets, fraud claims.
Judge of the Superior Court, County of Contra Costa 2003-2023
Supervising Judge of Family Court, 2022-2023.
Family Law, 2015-2018, 2022-2023.
Appellate Division, 2011-2023.
Juvenile Justice and Juvenile Dependency, 2018-2021.
Member of Executive Committee, 2013-2015, 2022-2023.
Supervising Judge of Richmond Branch, 2013-2015.
Criminal Law, 2003-2015.
Partner, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen 1984-2003
Managing Partner of San Francisco office, 2002-2003. Chair of Appellate Group, 2000-2003.
Involved in the creation and management of Women’s Mentoring Program for women associates. Partner since 1990.
University of California, Hastings College of the Law 1987, 1991
Adjunct Associate Professor of Remedies, 1987. Lecturer, Moot Court Program, 1991.
Law Clerk to the Honorable William E. Doyle 1983-1984
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Denver, Colorado.
J.D., cum laude, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY 1983
Article Editor, Cornell Law Review. Student Counsel, Cornell Legal Aid Clinic. Director, Gilbert & Sullivan’s Trial by Jury.
B.A. magna cum laude, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 1980
Majors in Psychology and French Literature. Received Limbach Prize for Outstanding Community Service for founding Rape Crisis Center serving central Connecticut.
“Judge Landau is amazing. It was wonderful working with her. My client and I give high praise and Judge Landau was instrumental to settlement.”
“It is my pleasure to share my recent experience with Judge Landau. It was no surprise that she connects well with the parties which is fundamental to having them buy into resolution. She facilitated reasonable compromise for both sides and helped counsel validate the idea of closure to the clients. “I’ll be back…..””
“Judge Landau did a wonderful job. She is personable, and when she met with the parties and counsel at the beginning of the mediation, she was informative about her process in mediation, encouraging of the ability of the parties to reach agreement, and gave the parties good advice to keep in mind as they were starting the process. She was supportive of my client (and I presume she was with his wife also), candid with her assessment of each party’s ideas for settlement and where some movement might be necessary, and ultimately assisted the parties in reaching agreement. Judge Landau is definitely on my short list if I have a need for a mediator or settlement judge in the future.”
“Judge Landau was FABULOUS. My client really liked her as well. On the way back from the mediation, she said, “I really liked the Judge, I would ‘hang’ with her.” My client was very impressed with the way Judge Landau explained things to her, making the process very simple and easier for her to make her final decision. I was extremely impressed with Judge Landau and her manner of approaching the collaborative mediation process with the opposing party, who is self-represented, and his consulting attorney. She was so professional and made everyone feel very comfortable during the process. We will definitely be using her again in the future.”
“Judge Landau was an excellent neutral. She helped settle a very contentious matter and did so in an effective and fair manner.”
“Judge Landau is smart, diligent, and so conscientious in everything she does and says, on the record or off the record. She always knows exactly what everyone in the room needs to hear at the right moment. She manages her time very well, and commands attention. She is gentle and kind when that is what is needed, and strong and direct when that is needed too. In all my hearings in front of her, regardless of whether I won or lost, my clients always reported back that they thought she was fair and thoughtful and felt heard. I do not get this feedback from other judges, but with her it was consistent. She has a gift for attuning herself to each case, and I always learn something from her every time I have an opportunity.”
“Judge Landau approached the case with gentle kid gloves at the beginning when my client really needed it, and also re-educated my client about the need to look at the case as a “math problem” so that we could actually move forward in settling the issues and moving the case forward. It was the perfect balance of delicate touch and straight-shooting that helped us settle a case we haven’t been able to settle in years.”
“I really appreciate Judge Landau’s time management and the way she structured the mediation. She exceptionally managed our time, didn’t allow the parties to focus on the wrong issues, and re-directed my client in exactly the ways she needed to hear – with gentleness and mindfulness. I look forward to having many more mediations and/or private judging relationships with her in the future, and would recommend her in a heartbeat. I have already recommended her to all 5 attorneys at my firm for future mediation cases.”
“Judge Landau did an excellent job. The parties were able to settle the case with respect to all issues. I fully expected this to happen because Judge Landau was an excellent Judge when she was with the Contra Costa Superior Court.”
