Profile

PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY

With over 37 years of experience in construction litigation and dispute resolution, John D. Hanover, Esq. is a seasoned construction law expert. His litigation practice focused exclusively on counseling clients in all roles of the building process for private and public works. His experience includes representing clients in complex, high-value disputes in hundreds of jury and nonjury trials, arbitrations, and mediations in matters involving contract disputes, schedule claims, unforeseen site conditions, and payment remedies to claims of defective work.

Mr. Hanover is known for his pragmatic and solutions-driven approach, with clients often describing him as “brilliant,” “reasonable,” and “practical.” His deep understanding of construction law, combined with his strong negotiation skills and calm demeanor under pressure, make him an ideal neutral for construction law disputes.

Mr. Hanover’s prior experience includes serving as Leader of the Construction & Government Contracts practice group at Alston & Bird and as Managing Partner of Peckar & Abramson’s three West Coast offices. He also held the role of outside general counsel for an international engineering, project management, and construction services firm, where he managed high-profile U.S. litigation matters.

In 2020, Mr. Hanover was named a “Client Service All-Star” by BTI Consulting Group, as well as one of the “Top Litigators & Trial Lawyers” in Los Angeles by Los Angeles Business Journal. He is ranked in Band 1 in Construction and Band 2 in International Arbitration: Construction in Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business, identified as a Thought Leader in construction law in Who’s Who Legal, is listed in The Best Lawyers of America® for Construction Law and Construction Litigation, and is a Fellow of the Construction Lawyers Society of America.

Mr. Hanover holds a B.A., summa cum laude, from Tufts University and a J.D. from Vanderbilt University School of Law. He is admitted to practice in California, Colorado, Nevada, and Tennessee and remains an active member of the American Bar Association’s Forum on Construction Law and Litigation Section and the Los Angeles County Bar Association, where he served as Chair of the Construction Law Subsection of the Real Property Section.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

  • ADR Services, Inc.: Mediator, Arbitrator, Referee, Special Master, 2024-Present
  • Alston & Bird: Partner, Construction & Government Contracts Group, 2017-2024
  • Banes Capital Group, LLC: President and General Counsel, 2012-2017
  • Peckar & Abramson, P.C.: Independent Contractor, 2012-2017
  • Peckar & Abramson, P.C.: Partner, 2004-2012
  • Hamburg, Hanover, Edwards & Martin LLP: Founding Partner, 1994-2002
  • Fierstein & Sturman: Associate/Partner, 1988-1992
  • Hanover, Walsh, Jalenak & Blair: Associate, 1986-1988

AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION

  • Construction Law
  • Real Estate
  • Neutral Evaluation
  • Business and Commercial
  • Complex Litigation
  • Dispute Avoidance and Resolution Board (DARB)
  • International Arbitration
  • Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith
  • Employment

EDUCATION

  • J.D., Vanderbilt University, 1986
  • B.A., Tufts University, 1983

MEDIATION TRAINING

  • Certification, American Institute of Mediation, “Mediating Commercial and Litigated Cases”, September 2024
  • Certification, Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution at Pepperdine University School of Law, “Mediating Complex Construction Disputes”, June 2017

BAR ADMISSIONS

  • California
  • Colorado
  • Nevada
  • Tennessee

MEMBERSHIPS

  • American Bar Association, Forum on Construction Law and Litigation Section
  • L.A. County Bar Association, Construction Law Subsection of Real Property Section, Chair
  • Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, Legal Division, Chair, 2006-2007
  • Wexner Heritage Program, 2003-2005
  • Los Angeles Hillel Council, President, 2002-2004
  • Construction Lawyers Society of America

Representative Cases

Construction Law

  • Dispute involved the claims of a multinational construction management firm for delay and scope changes resulting from differing site conditions related to the construction of a portion of the Westside extension of the Los Angeles subway system.
  • Matter involved claims for delay, defects, and nonpayment on a $2 billion-plus mixed-use project in Downtown Los Angeles.
  • Matter related to claims for delay, scope changes, and defective work in the replacement of an iconic bridge in Downtown Los Angeles.
  • Dispute involved a multinational design and engineering firm with claims related to the failure of a bulkhead wall that formed a new harbor in the Port of Los Angeles.
  • Case involved claims of a multinational design and engineering firm for delay and inefficiency damages related to a defective design of a freeway interchange.
  • Matter involved a multinational owner prosecuting counterclaims against a contractor for scope changes and delay damages related to construction of a pea protein isolate processing plant located in South Sioux City, NE.
  • Matter involved a multinational design and engineering contractor in a dispute over the delay of completion of two border patrol and police headquarters buildings in Nimruz Province, Afghanistan.
  • Action involved a construction management firm with claims for delays, equitable adjustment, and disgorgement related to license violations in the design-build of the San Francisco County Jail No. 3.
  • Matter involved a multinational construction management firm in an action brought by a subcontractor relating to curtain wall construction on a multistory parking garage.
  • Action related to the prosecution of claims by a construction management firm for reimbursement for defense costs of asbestosis/mesothelioma claims related to jobsites in several states during a 60-year period.
  • Case involved a claim by an HOA against a developer for construction defects in a 161-unit condominium complex.
  • Dispute related to a religious institution’s prosecution of claims to recover for delay, loss of use, and defective construction for a West Los Angeles sacred space/school.
  • Matter involved the owner-developer’s claim for defects and loss of use related to construction of a Florida retirement community.
  • Dispute between the owner of a single-family estate property and a contractor for delay, loss of use, and defective construction.
  • Action involved a multinational general contractor’s claim against a design firm for negligent design in the design and construction of a retirement home/senior care facility.
  • Matter involved claims of a developer/bank owner for delay, loss of use, and defective construction of a hotel development in Shell Beach, CA.
  • Matter by subcontractor that built the canals at the Venetian Casino in Las Vegas in against owner to recover payment for work performed.
  • Matter involved claims by a general contractor for recovery on a mechanic’s lien for a resort project on the Nevada–California border.
  • Action related to a multinational general contractor’s claims of delay, loss of use, and defective construction for the construction of the Simi Valley Hospital.
  • Dispute related to a developer’s claims against a contractor and subcontractors involving mold and fungus growth from a defective exterior insulation and finishing system (EIFS) in a multi-hundred-unit apartment complex.
  • Case involved claims by owners of a Sun Valley, ID, private residential compound for defective design and construction of four private residences on site.
  • Dispute related to claims against a general contractor for delay, loss of use, and defective construction for the replacement of the basketball floor of the Haas Pavilion at UC Berkeley.
  • Case involved claims of defective construction related to the construction of the ARTS building at UC Riverside.
  • Matter involved claims against a general contractor for delay and loss of use relating to the construction of a dormitory at UC San Diego.
  • Dispute involved an engineering firm and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power related to claims of negligence against the designer and contractor of a water treatment plant in Los Angeles.

view all

Testimonials

“John Hanover is a top-notch construction litigator. He is brilliant and also reasonable in his approach, and understands the value of time and money invested in dispute resolution. He acts in a way that is commercial.”


“John fulfills and exceeds all expectations.”


“I very much respect John; he is one of the most polite people I’ve worked with. He is very practical, low-key and not easily fazed in any respect.”


“John is a very good attorney and knows the California market.”