Case Manager: Joanna Barron
Available for: Mediation, Arbitration, Discovery Reference, Appellate Services, Private Trial
Judge Goodman joined ADR Services, Inc. in 2019 after a distinguished 24 years of judicial service, including 20 years as a Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court and 4 years as an Associate Justice Pro Tem of the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District. Prior to his service on the bench, he was a lawyer in private practice advising businesses and handling litigation matters in state and federal courts, and served as Deputy Attorney General for the California Department of Justice, where he argued three cases before the United States Supreme Court.
Judge Goodman is an exceptionally well-respected and thorough jurist who measures the consequences of his decisions with an even hand. His ability to grasp and disentangle complex legal disputes is aided by his diligent preparation and research into the issues at hand. He now brings the same expertise and intelligence to his ADR practice to help litigants resolve their disputes.
California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District 2016-2019
Associate Justice Pro Tem, by appointment of the Chief Justice of California 1998, 2002, 2014-2015
Authored numerous appellate decisions for Divisions Two, Three, Five and Eight, including published opinions on arbitration, business, environmental (including CEQA), employment, legal malpractice, probate, real estate, and criminal matters, and on proper exercise of governmental powers; participated in review and determination of petitions for writs of mandate to superior courts.
Assigned Judges Program 2015-2016
Judge of the Superior Court, by appointment of the Chief Justice of California
Appointed to hear direct calendar matters in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, including all pre-trial and trial matters in business, employment, landlord-tenant, eminent domain and personal injury.
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 2001-2015
Judge of the Superior Court
Presided over direct calendar unlimited jurisdiction civil courtrooms, resolving anti-trust, arbitration, business, elder abuse, environmental (including CEQA), medical and legal malpractice, personal injury and toxic tort matters; tried over 500 cases to jury verdict or to judgment following court trial.
Municipal Court of California, County of Los Angeles 1995-2001
Judge of the Municipal Court
(Cross-assigned to Los Angeles Superior Court) Pre-trial and trial of business, malpractice, personal injury and criminal matters, and of petitions to compel arbitration and to confirm arbitration awards.
Allan J. Goodman, A Professional Corporation 1979-1994
Private practice focusing on general counsel advice to start-up and development stage businesses and to medical professionals developing proprietary products, and venture capital financing for those businesses; unfair competition and trademark advice and litigation in state and federal courts; real estate transactions and CERCLA compliance; estate, trust and probate matters on behalf of high net worth individuals.
Deputy Attorney General of California 1970-1979
Trial and appellate litigation; investigation of allegations of misconduct by public officials; enforcement of consumer protection and unfair competition statutes; regulation and supervision of health care service plans; public land law; served as Legislative Advocate in California Legislature and U.S. Congress on consumer protection and public lands matters.
Argued three cases in the United States Supreme Court:
Jones v. General Mills and Jones v. Rath Packing Company (1976) 430 U.S. 519: argued on behalf of 39 States and Attorneys General (whether Supremacy or Interstate Commerce Clauses of U.S. Constitution preclude enforcement of state labeling laws more stringent than federal statutes); and
California v. Arizona and The United States (1978) 440 U.S. 59: argued on behalf of the State of California (whether Congress has the power to reduce the Constitutional grant of Original Jurisdiction to the U.S. Supreme Court); and argued over 50 cases in the California and federal appellate courts.
Editorial Board Member, California Litigation Current
Committee on Judicial Education and Research (CJER) 1995-2015
California Continuing Education of the Bar 2006, 2007
Los Angeles Superior Court BAJI Committee 1999-2004
Faculty, Bernard E. Witkin Judicial College 1997-2002
Regent of the University of California 1979-1981
Chair, LACBA Taxation Section, Estate and Gift Tax Committees 1980s
Judge, Moot Court and Clinical Trial Programs, LACBA and UCLA Law School Various
J.D., University of California, Los Angeles 1970
B.A., University of California, Santa Cruz 1967
Post-degree courses at Harvard Law School in Antitrust Law and Estate Planning
Brookings – American Enterprise Institute Judicial Education Program
Member, Los Angeles County Bar Association and American Bar Association
Admitted to practice in California and New York, all federal courts in California, U.S. Supreme Court
Distinguished Judge, Los Angeles Municipal Court Presiding Judges Association 1998, 1999
“Judge Goodman had a terrific ability to distill extraordinarily complex matters. The case we had couldn’t have been more contentious and heated – lots of money, very, very complicated legal issues, and they had to apply federal law, state law. Not all arbitrators can do that – not even close. When I’m checking boxes for an arbitrator, I want someone who is very smart and able to analyze complicated legal issues. And I just don’t think you could get a better arbitrator to preside over your matter because he is extremely fair to both the plaintiff’s side and the defendant, and he knows how to run a very efficient trial.”
“Judge Goodman was extremely effective. Some mediators are better than others at coming into the mediation with full knowledge of the facts. He certainly did. There were multiple defendants involved in the matter who were struggling with some tricky issues. I’m still not sure how Judge Goodman was able to navigate that, but he clearly was able to get two parties on the other side, who were at war with one another, to at least focus on their collective issue vis-à-vis my client. He was eventually able to get a good result, and I just didn’t think it was going to be possible, given the dynamics on the other side.”
“Judge Goodman was candid with his opinions in both matters but did a great job of listening to the parties. It makes the clients feel heard, which I think is half the goal in mediation. I think sometimes mediators can come off more aggressively in trying to reach a resolution, but he does a really great job of riding that line. You want to reach a settlement. You want to do that efficiently, but he’s really good at listening to the positions. If you’re in a mediation, there’s usually something going on besides just money. There’s usually a reason the parties aren’t able to reach a resolution on their own, and he did a really good job bringing parties together.”
“Judge Goodman made himself available on an time sensitive matter and provided excellent and thorough insight.”