Case Manager: Sydney Wright
Since 2005, Mr. Conant has been mediating privately and in conjunction with court-sponsored ADR programs. Since 2016, he has been a full-time neutral, and has successfully mediated 1,000+ disputes, including cases arising from vehicular accidents, product liability, premises liability, landlord/tenant, construction defect, business and commercial contract, real property, medical/insurance liens, public entity liability, and professional malpractice. Mr. Conant is certified as a mediator, having completed extensive mediation training courses.
For over 36 years, Mr. Conant was a trial lawyer specializing in product liability, general liability and professional liability matters. He has litigated numerous personal injury and product liability cases involving claims for catastrophic injury and wrongful death. In addition, he has supervised litigation in the western United States for nationally recognized clients in the transportation and hospitality industries.
Mr. Conant has extensive jury trial experience throughout Northern California. He is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA) and the American College of Trial Lawyers. Mr. Conant has successfully handled lawsuits involving regional and national clients as well as various Bay Area public entities. From 1985 until 1999, Mr. Conant was a partner with Hardin, Cook, Loper, Engel & Bergez. From 1999 until 2016, Mr. Conant was managing partner at Lombardi, Loper & Conant, LLP.
“Matt Conant is an excellent mediator. I have mediated with Matt several times, and I am ALWAYS pleased with Matt’s effort and his mediation skills. Whenever opposing counsel suggests Matt as a mediator, I jump at the chance to engage him. I never turn down the opportunity to use Matt as a mediator. In my opinion, he is the best of the best.”
“Matt Conant is without question among the very, very best mediators in the Bay Area, in acumen and the art of mediating, and in industry and effort in continuing to pursue settlement post-mediation. He’s respected by my friends on both sides.”
“Matt Conant is not only highly skilled, but he has empathy and deeply cares about the outcome. His efforts in communicating with the parties before, during, and after mediation are above and beyond. He also has a solid understanding of how to evaluate a case.”
“Matt Conant is an extraordinarily talented neutral who commands respect and cooperation from both sides of the case. I would use his services again with no hesitation and will recommend to anyone in need.”
“Matt Conant is wonderful. I have also had excellent experiences with Justice Lambden, Judge Chiantelli, and Ralph Lombardi.”
“Matt is incredible. Would double the stars if I could. Was very patient with a difficult party.”
“Matt bonds readily and easily – at least with my clients – I think because they sense he does care about the outcome for them and how they’re doing. When he implements the case evaluation and focuses on strengths and weaknesses part of his skill set, it’s often things that are hard for a party to hear because that may not be how they’ve seen their case. …But if you hear it from someone you believe has your best interests in mind and at heart, you hear it. And it has an impact on the decisions you ultimately make.”
“Rather than spending time during the mediation uncovering issues or having to have a back and forth about what’s important to the resolution of the case, a lot of that work when you mediate with Matt has already been done, so you can get right to the heart of the matter, which is deciding if there is a number that both sides can reach that makes sense to resolve the case.”
“Matt was incredible. He juggled all of the different competing issues from all the different lawyers. There were so many different groups and everybody had a different angle and a different interest and a different client and a different position in the case. That’s how tenacious Matt is. He kept working it and working it and just would not stop.”
“Matt really is a skilled evaluator of case values, and he’s good at honing in on strengths and weaknesses and keeping them as a focus of discussion, so both sides stay grounded.”